Feminist reading – Page 4 – A Bevy of Books

A pair by Joanne Harris

I have previously extolled the virtues of Joanne Harris, so no one should be surprised that I picked up two more of her books: Holy Fools and Coastliners. I had Powell’s credit, so I went to ‘Harris’ on the shelf and grabbed the cheapest two that I hadn’t already read. I did not realize that they were actually linked to each other – and I even read them in the proper order!

Holy Fools was my favorite of the two. Set in the 17^th century in a French nunnery on a secluded island, it examines love, evil, miracles, organized religion (the institution vs. the belief system) and being true to yourself. This story is told almost exclusively from the viewpoint of Juliette, a gypsy & itinerant player who hides away in a nunnery with her young daughter after a brush with the law. Regardless of whether you like her or agree with her, Juliette is a vivid and real character that is hard to stop reading about.

The world as I see it is one where there are few easy answers, and knowing yourself and being true to that self offer the only chance of retaining one’s sanity and still being happy. Juliette loves the wrong man, makes poor decisions and doesn’t always do the right thing – but loves with her whole heart, and cares for all of the people she loves to the very best of her not-inconsiderable abilities. When put in an impossible situation, she strays pretty far outside the box to protect her friends and her daughter, and even punish the bad guys a little. The ending is left up to the reader, no easy answers and no plot tied up in a neat package – another preference of mine. No one’s story has a precise beginning or ending, and I prefer fiction that knows how to end a book without a metaphorical ‘they lived happily ever after.’ This one didn’t have the emphasis on food that her other books had (at least, the ones I’ve read), but the mood is powerfully rendered and hard to leave behind.

Coastliners might have been a fine book if I hadn’t been comparing it to Harris’s other work. It certainly is not a bad book, by any stretch. Good characters, setting was unique, interesting and well-written, plot was effective. I think what was missing – for me, at least – was a powerful theme. All of Harris’s other books have a guiding focus that uses every plot twist, character flaw and detail of setting to support her message. In contrast, Coastliners read more like a great summer read without too much depth to it. Of course, in comparison to a true ‘summer read’ kind of book (I’m thinking of something like Evanovich or Shopaholic-type reads) this one is plenty deep. Mado is a young woman returning to the island she called home as a child after her mother dies. Her reclusive father still lives there, and she’s soon caught up in the drama of the haves vs. the have-nots on the island. My favorite thing about the book? Harris has two nuns that were inspired by Charles de Lint’s Crow Girls! I love it when the strange pieces of my life intersect.

I am currently revisiting my obsession with The Wheel of Time, after reading the latest book. Suddenly, not spending so much time on the computer…

Fangirl post: Justice Sandra Day O’Connor

I think I have always been a fan of Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. I can remember being in sixth grade and finding out that President Reagan had nominated a woman as Supreme Court Justice. We must have talked about it at school, because the memory is attached to my classroom (shout-out to Mr. Brown’s sixth grade, Iditarod Elementary!). She’s been a fabulous role model and has written some wonderful decisions that make clear (to me at least) how the law protects individuals from government intervention. I recently read two books of hers – Lazy B: Growing Up on a Cattle Ranch in the American Southwest (with her brother H. Alan Day) and The Majesty of the Law: Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice.

I saw Justice O’Connor on Charlie Rose years ago (I believe in support of Lazy B) and was so impressed with her class and poise. Rose – hardly a pushy interviewer – had asked her to comment on her fellow justices (Clarence Thomas, in particular – a rather mild question regarding his lack of decision writing during his tenure on the Court) and she told him, very calmly and politely, that she would not discuss her colleagues. When he asked another question similar to the first, she just sat – dignified and attentive – waiting for the next question. Not sullen, not defensive, not angry or even irritated. She had already answered him and was very comfortable sitting in silence until he asked a new question worth answering. It was so cool! My respect for her leaped higher.

I tend to be a passionate defender of women’s rights and the feminist perspective. Justice O’Connor is a calm, reasoned defender of the inherent rights in all persons, defended in this country by the Constitution and the three branches of government created by that fabulous document. I get riled up about women getting paid less and treated as sex objects; she deliberates quietly about what the Bill of Rights says, how men and women have used the Rule of Law to defend themselves against unjust actions. When I read what she’s written, I remember that what provokes my – often emotional – response can also be defended by citing law and reason. I’m glad she’s around to do it for us, because I certainly do not have that kind of poise and equanimity.

That interview was 7 years ago, but I just finally read Lazy B, as well as The Majesty of the Law. Neither of these books is terribly exciting or plot-driven. Lazy B – written with her brother – is the story of their childhood on a ranch which cut across the border between Arizona and New Mexico. Lazy B reads more like an essay or a biography – but not of a person, but rather a place and way of life. It follows the lives of the people who lived and worked that ranch – their parents, cowhands and others – and how a great deal of self-confidence and self-sufficiency was necessary to keep it running profitably. Anyone interested in ranching life in the Southwest during the first half of this century would enjoy it, as well as those who were interested in Justice O’Connor’s early life. Anyone looking for juicy details about O’Connor (or her family) will be disappointed. She brings the same sense of decorum to the book as she does to other aspects of her demeanor.

The Majesty of the Law is what to read if you are looking for insight into the mind of O’Connor. Again, not a personal or exciting book, but filled with what influenced her in the past and interests her now regarding the law in the U.S. and beyond. She looks at the creation of the Supreme Court and its authority, how the Court has changed, and influential Justices over the last 200 years. She also discusses her views on way to improve the current system (revamp the jury system, reintroduce ethics into the legal profession) and the spread of the Rule of Law throughout the world. All of this with a thoroughly reasoned approach that makes it clear that she has facts, figures, history and law to back up her conclusions.

I wonder if she was chosen as Supreme Court Justice because of her grace, or being a Supreme Court Justice caused her to become so refined. Either way, it makes me sad that she no longer sits with those who are looking out for us.

Just call me one of the people…

My sister is a big fan of the historical bodice-ripper, but People of the Book, by Geraldine Brooks, is my kind of historical fiction. As soon as I saw the title, there was no question that I would have to seriously consider purchasing this book. The blurb on the back did nothing to discourage me. As much as the title sounds like a cheesy take on low-rent historical novels, what’s inside is a fabulous read by Pulitzer-prize-winning author Brooks (whom I’ve never read before).

Hanna is a specialist in text preservation, sent to Sarajevo to authenticate and restore a 500-year-old, illustrated Jewish prayer book, known as the Sarajevo Haggadah (which really exists). As Hanna examines and rebinds the book, we learn the history of the book through those who created, sheltered and used the book throughout its history. Much of the history Brooks shares is accurate (with names and details changed) and much is invented, but the result is a tribute to those who put what is right above what is safe. Part detective novel, part human drama, part history lesson – this novel contains the best and worst of human behavior in all its glory.

As we follow the book through its travels, we visit places where – contrary to the current public discourse – Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony as well as close quarters. And yes, that was places – plural. Seville, Vienna and Sarajevo are among the cities where people lived together, putting their parallels as human beings above their disparities as believers. None of these golden ages lasted forever – nothing is certain but change. I revel in these examples of places and times when people realized that – regardless of upbringing or faith – we all have something to learn and share with each other. The things we have in common are more important and numerous than the things we do not. I’m sure that comes across as simplistic and sappy – but that doesn’t mean it is false. That is what I believe, and what keeps me going in the face of a negative world. It is nice to spend time with someone who shares my view, and includes evidence of whole communities who agreed. Those of us who wish to build a future of diversity and understanding can be encouraged by past successes.

Regardless of whether or not this theme is important to you, the story is gripping, the character of Hanna is interesting, and any fan of the CSI shows will find lots of scientific exploration to entertain them. The writing is not top-notch, but well-done and moves at a nice pace. I thought the frame story of Hanna’s life was a bit thin, but the story of the book is well-executed and a great read.

Why can’t they all be this good?

The Stone Diaries by Carol Shields is the story of one person’s life as she experiences the 20th century (primarily) in North America. There are wars, depression, children, love, work, illness, death and everything else in-between. One of the first books I discussed here was Happenstance, also by Shields. I liked it, but had expected more. TSD was everything I expected from a Shields novel – well-written, surprising, technically impressive and full of interesting commentary on the human condition. Of course, you don’t have to take my word for it – it won a Pulitzer Prize, the Governor General’s Award (Canada) and National Book Critics Circle Award.

This is the good stuff. Every detail speaks to every other detail, and there are layers underneath the layers. One example: the title – The Stone Diaries – works on several levels. The book is a ‘diary’ of Daisy’s life – and her mother’s maiden name is Stone (though we know nothing about Mercy Stone’s family). Daisy’s father and father-in-law were both stone cutters in rural Canada in the early 1900s, and her father eventually made his fortune selling a popular limestone in Indiana. After Daisy’s mother dies, her father constructs a tower of stone around her grave. The tower becomes so big that it attracts tourists to the area. He also starts a stone pyramid in Bloomington after returning from a trip to Egypt, but never finishes it. These are only the references to stone I can immediately recall – there are dozens more.

The book has an interesting structure. It is written as a biography or journal – including letters from relatives and supposed family pictures – but is a work of fiction. The book is separated into different sections – Childhood, Love, Ease, Death, etc. Each section is presented differently. For instance, the section where we learn of the unusual circumstances of Daisy’s birth is narrated by an omniscient Daisy. Daisy tells how she imagines her birth (and the mother she never knew) based on the facts she’s been given. This is the only section where we truly get a first-person account of Daisy’s life – the part she had no personal recollection of.

After her husband dies, she writes a column for the local newspaper. This section is presented via letters written to Daisy – nothing written by Daisy herself or even any events narrated in a third-person. She is writing for a living, but we don’t see any of her writing. I am certain this is a deliberate attempt to illustrate her powerlessness, she has a ‘voice’ in her writing, but in the end she is ‘let go’ so a man could have the job.

There is a different form for each section, but it is never choppy or a case of style interfering with story-telling. I never lost interest and was always wondering what was coming on the next page. Shields is a master at conveying not just events, but experiences. This one goes in the permanent collection.

Ain’t she a beauty…

I think the best literature is that which attempts to bring the basic human experience to light. I know that there is a different story for every individual person on this big ball of dirt, but the inner workings of all 6.5 million of them are not terribly different – only the circumstances. We all love, hate, cry, laugh, eat, sleep and struggle. The best writers can tell you things about yourself and your fellow human beings that you didn’t know you already knew. On Beauty by Zadie Smith is one of those.

On Beauty is the story of a family. There are lots of details about this family I could tell you – the mother is a black Americanwoman from the south and the father is a white Englishman. The husband is a professor of Art Criticism who is very cerebral, the wife is a hospital administrator who is very emotional. They have three children who are smart and funny and very, very different. They live in the Boston area. The children are all in their late teens-early 20s. The marriage is going through a rough patch.

But those are just facts. They are sharply depicted but merely the backdrop on which this novel is painted. The title is On Beauty, and that beauty comes in lots of flavors here, but they ultimately lead back to the central beauty – love. Not sappy romantic love – real-life, hard-core, everyday all day love. Husbands, wives, children, siblings, parents, family, friends. The love that ties them together, causes them pain and heals their wounds. It wrenches the heart and makes it new. Smith shows us how love looks – how it cannot exist without pain and forgiveness and clarity and commitment.

In case I’ve been unclear up to this point, let me just state for the record – I love this book. I love it for a dozen reasons – the writing is fabulous, the family dynamics are powerfully and painfully accurate in detail and texture. It takes place on a college campus full of over-educated brainiacs who use the ‘cancer of their intellect’ to avoid facing their emotions (as I did for much of my life). All its characters are beautifully flawed human beings. But the reason this book will remain on my shelf forever (now that I finally own it) is because of one passage.

I read this book several years ago (it was published in 2005) and wrote this passages down in a journal I have for quotes that resonate powerfully within me. This one is a favorite out of those – one that, while I can’t quote it word-for-word, I never forget is in there.

The three siblings in the book (aged 16 to 22) have just bumped into each other serendipitously on a street corner, and to celebrate they go have coffee together. The oldest brother, Jerome – just back from college for the holidays – is basking in the happy glow of being with his siblings:

Before the world existed, before it was populated, and before there were wars and jobs and colleges and movies and clothes and opinions and foreign travel – before all of these things there had been only one person, Zora, and only one place: a tent in the living room made from chairs and bed-sheets. After a few years, Levi arrived: space was made for him; it was as if he had always been. Looking at them both now, Jerome found himself in their finger joints and neat conch ears, in their long legs and wild curls. He heard himself in their partial lisps caused by puffy tongues vibrating against slightly noticeable buckteeth. He did not consider if or how or why he loved them. They were just love: they were the first evidence he ever had of love, and they would be the last confirmation of love when everything else fell away.

Makes me tear up every time I read it. This passage made me feel guilty for not giving my son siblings. It makes me want to pick up the phone and call my sisters and tell them I love them. I’ve never read anything that comes close to portraying how being a sibling feels to me. And I want to thank Zadie Smith for that gift, and share it with all of you.